Environmental taxation in the European Union-Analysis, challenges, and the future
Само за регистроване кориснике
2013
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
In this paper, the authors intend to show that environmental taxes are an economic instrument that entirely supports the principles of sustainable development and has impact on balanced improvement of all its four pillars (economic, ecological, social, and institutional). Environmental taxes provide a flexible and cost-effective means for reinforcing the polluter-pays principle and for reaching environmental policy objectives. Enforcement of environmental taxes (and penalties) simultaneously generates multiple values-it stimulates ecologically acceptable production, generates budget revenue, and stimulates socially responsible behavior. The subject of the analysis is determination of environmental taxes in the European Union (EU) member states in total amount and as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), as well as monitoring of their trend in the period 2005-2010. To obtain a broad picture, results collected for EU-27 region have been compared with data for sample countries wor...ldwide, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) countries. The revenue from environmental taxes in the EU-27 is not negligible, amounting to about 3% of total revenues. The highest tax revenue as a percent of GDP was noted in Denmark-9% on average. Environmentally related revenues and their percent of GDP in sample countries reported diverse results. In the USA, China, and India, environmentally related revenue as a percent of GDP stood at around 1%, with a downward trend in time. The highest tax revenue as a percent of GDP was recorded in Turkey, Russia, South Africa, and Brazil, 4% on average, with an upward trend in time. However, increasing revenues from environmental taxes should be interpreted with caution. The increases may be caused by the introduction of new taxes or an increase in tax rates, or alternatively may be linked to an increase in the tax base.
Извор:
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2013, 5, 4Издавач:
- AMER INST PHYSICS, MELVILLE
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
- Европске интеграције и друштвено-економске промене привреде Србије на путу ка ЕУ (RS-MESTD-Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)-47009)
- Изазови и перспективе структурних промена у Србији: стратешки правци економског развоја и усклађивања са захтевима ЕУ (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-179015)
DOI: 10.1063/1.4817963
ISSN: 1941-7012
WoS: 000323945600054
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84884187298
Институција/група
Fakultet zaštite životne sredineTY - JOUR AU - Golušin, Mirjana AU - Ivanović-Munitlak, Olja AU - Filipović, Sanja AU - Andrejević, Andrea AU - Đuran, Jelena PY - 2013 UR - https://redun.educons.edu.rs/handle/123456789/209 AB - In this paper, the authors intend to show that environmental taxes are an economic instrument that entirely supports the principles of sustainable development and has impact on balanced improvement of all its four pillars (economic, ecological, social, and institutional). Environmental taxes provide a flexible and cost-effective means for reinforcing the polluter-pays principle and for reaching environmental policy objectives. Enforcement of environmental taxes (and penalties) simultaneously generates multiple values-it stimulates ecologically acceptable production, generates budget revenue, and stimulates socially responsible behavior. The subject of the analysis is determination of environmental taxes in the European Union (EU) member states in total amount and as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), as well as monitoring of their trend in the period 2005-2010. To obtain a broad picture, results collected for EU-27 region have been compared with data for sample countries worldwide, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) countries. The revenue from environmental taxes in the EU-27 is not negligible, amounting to about 3% of total revenues. The highest tax revenue as a percent of GDP was noted in Denmark-9% on average. Environmentally related revenues and their percent of GDP in sample countries reported diverse results. In the USA, China, and India, environmentally related revenue as a percent of GDP stood at around 1%, with a downward trend in time. The highest tax revenue as a percent of GDP was recorded in Turkey, Russia, South Africa, and Brazil, 4% on average, with an upward trend in time. However, increasing revenues from environmental taxes should be interpreted with caution. The increases may be caused by the introduction of new taxes or an increase in tax rates, or alternatively may be linked to an increase in the tax base. PB - AMER INST PHYSICS, MELVILLE T2 - Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy T1 - Environmental taxation in the European Union-Analysis, challenges, and the future IS - 4 VL - 5 DO - 10.1063/1.4817963 UR - conv_812 ER -
@article{ author = "Golušin, Mirjana and Ivanović-Munitlak, Olja and Filipović, Sanja and Andrejević, Andrea and Đuran, Jelena", year = "2013", abstract = "In this paper, the authors intend to show that environmental taxes are an economic instrument that entirely supports the principles of sustainable development and has impact on balanced improvement of all its four pillars (economic, ecological, social, and institutional). Environmental taxes provide a flexible and cost-effective means for reinforcing the polluter-pays principle and for reaching environmental policy objectives. Enforcement of environmental taxes (and penalties) simultaneously generates multiple values-it stimulates ecologically acceptable production, generates budget revenue, and stimulates socially responsible behavior. The subject of the analysis is determination of environmental taxes in the European Union (EU) member states in total amount and as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), as well as monitoring of their trend in the period 2005-2010. To obtain a broad picture, results collected for EU-27 region have been compared with data for sample countries worldwide, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) countries. The revenue from environmental taxes in the EU-27 is not negligible, amounting to about 3% of total revenues. The highest tax revenue as a percent of GDP was noted in Denmark-9% on average. Environmentally related revenues and their percent of GDP in sample countries reported diverse results. In the USA, China, and India, environmentally related revenue as a percent of GDP stood at around 1%, with a downward trend in time. The highest tax revenue as a percent of GDP was recorded in Turkey, Russia, South Africa, and Brazil, 4% on average, with an upward trend in time. However, increasing revenues from environmental taxes should be interpreted with caution. The increases may be caused by the introduction of new taxes or an increase in tax rates, or alternatively may be linked to an increase in the tax base.", publisher = "AMER INST PHYSICS, MELVILLE", journal = "Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy", title = "Environmental taxation in the European Union-Analysis, challenges, and the future", number = "4", volume = "5", doi = "10.1063/1.4817963", url = "conv_812" }
Golušin, M., Ivanović-Munitlak, O., Filipović, S., Andrejević, A.,& Đuran, J.. (2013). Environmental taxation in the European Union-Analysis, challenges, and the future. in Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy AMER INST PHYSICS, MELVILLE., 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4817963 conv_812
Golušin M, Ivanović-Munitlak O, Filipović S, Andrejević A, Đuran J. Environmental taxation in the European Union-Analysis, challenges, and the future. in Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy. 2013;5(4). doi:10.1063/1.4817963 conv_812 .
Golušin, Mirjana, Ivanović-Munitlak, Olja, Filipović, Sanja, Andrejević, Andrea, Đuran, Jelena, "Environmental taxation in the European Union-Analysis, challenges, and the future" in Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 5, no. 4 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4817963 ., conv_812 .